California’s on-again, off-again hydrogen highway seems to be on again, thanks to $7.7 million ponied up by the Air Resources Board final week. It’s chump change. And it reflects the state’s ambiguous, cash-strapped and corrupt approach to lowering emissions.
If taxpayers are going to subsidize an infrastructure for alternative fuels, why hydrogen? Automakers are pushing it, that’s why. And to be certain, hydrogen cars are already here, steaming around American roads.
But electric cars are the more positive future. Project Better Place, an entirely private venture, is building an electric-car infrastructure in Israel. In doing so, it’s having to work with automakers to set up various industry standards. It’s actually having a say in what electric cars will be.
Photo: Jurvetson, licensed through Creative Commons
And that’s not the only alternative. Read after the jump.
Guy Negre’s air-powered cars, first considered
The Aircar can reach 70 mph and has a range of 125 miles . . . on flat roads. The greatest drawback to the technology is that air doesn’t store much energy. So recharging stations would need to be as abundant as gasoline stations are nowadays. They would be far less toxic, however, and would be far easier to build and maintain–especially whether taxpayers weren’t underwriting them.
Photo: Air ability Motors
Original post by Marty Jerome

























Related Articles
1 user responded in this post
Hydrogen is the future. We need to get on with it. California can be a clear leader.
Leave A Reply
Please Note: Comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comments